Disability, Disease, and Climate Change

In Butler’s Sower, Lauren’s disability of hyperempathy is an integral element of the novel. Through the lens of her disability, Lauren is able to actually feel the pain of other beings and even animals. Her hyperempathy can be seen as both a superhero quality as well as a disabling one. On the superhero note, Lauren is able to act with a special intuition as she knows not only how someone else will feel in the situation but also how she will feel as a conduit for their pain. On the disabling note, Lauren is sometimes unable to act because she knows how much pain it will cause, even when it comes to matters of her own safety such as practicing gunmanship. 

In Lerner’s 10:04, the reader is quickly introduced to the idea of life altering diagnosis. The main character is diagnosed with Marfan’s disease, a cardiac condition that can have life threatening implications without intervention. We as the reader see how his life changes after his diagnosis, and how that interacts with the environment around him of impending doom and destruction as a result of climate change. 

Lerner’s novel is not like the other two novels that we have read in this class in terms of climate change. For one, our other novels were written a few decades ago, whereas Lerner’s novel was published in 2015. Another way Lerner’s novel is different is that it falls beneath the genres of metafiction and autofiction. As the novel is being crafted, the reader is not removed from this process. Rather through this lens, the reader sees some of the stylistic choices contemplated upon by the author throughout the novel. As for autofiction, the events of the story are based upon events that actually took place in the author’s life. 

Though there are many differences between our other two novels in this course and Lerner’s work, I did want to highlight something that I saw as somewhat of a similarity between Butler and Lerner. This similarity is the intersection between disease and disability. I find it interesting that a disability is not always a disease, but a disease is more likely than not a disability. In Butler, we have a character with a disability. In Lerner, we have a character with a disease. Even though disability and disease can be two different things, they are one in the same by the way in which they change someone’s outlook on life. In Butler, as Lauren gets older, she is able to channel her hyperempathy in ways that increase her chance of survival. In Lerner, we see the main character changing some of his stances in life over the fact that he feels as though he is facing impending death. An example of this is when he gives the sperm sample. I also find it interesting that disease and disability are partnered with the climate change crisis. Even though disease and disability can be seen as negative, they also have some plus sides in how they alter our perception of life. This altered perception can be crucial to survive in times of ecological turmoil, or turmoil in general.



Simple Bibliography

Agusti, Clara Escoda. “The Relationship between Community and Subjectivity in Octavia E. Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Extrapolation, vol. 46, no. 3, 2005, pp. 351–359., https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2005.46.3.7.

Grecca, Gabriela Bruschini. “‘A Racist Challenge Might Force Us Apart’: Divergence, Reliance and Empathy in Parable of the Sower, by Octavia Butler.” Ilha Desterro, vol. 74, no. 1, 2021, pp. 347–362., https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2021.e73535.

Guerrero, Paula Barba. “Post-Apocalyptic Memory Sites: Damaged Space, Nostalgia, and Refuge in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Science-Fiction Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, 2021, p. 29., https://doi.org/10.5621/sciefictstud.48.1.0029.

Hampton, Gregory J. “Migration and Capital of the Body: Octavia Butler’s ‘Parable of the Sower.’” CLA Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, 2005, pp. 56–73.

Magid, Annette M. Apocalyptic Projections: A Study of Past Predictions, Current Trends and Future Intimations as Related to Film and Literature. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.

Phillips, Jerry. “The Intuition of the Future: Utopia and Catastrophe in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Novel : a Forum on Fiction, vol. 35, no. 2-3, 2002, pp. 299–311., https://doi.org/10.2307/1346188.

Yarish, Jasmine Noelle. “Seeding a Black Feminist Future on the Horizon of a Third Reconstruction: The Abolitionist Politics of Self-Care in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, 2021, pp. 58–72., https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1870089.

 

My research process has been kind of unconventional. I feel like I may be doing the project in reverse. Though I started with a research topic, I was not able to find much about gender and Butler’s Parable of a Sower. So, I am not sure how successful that research project will be with the slim number of resources. Now I am kind of trying to find whatever I can find that interests me on Butler’s novel, working towards reading the articles, and refining my ideas on the text as I read the ideas of others. I am not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Right now, I am just kind of “riding the wave” and going with it. I found it most helpful to search author and title in Hunter OneSearch. I was able to find a lot of different articles. Now my job is to synthesize by finding which one’s resonate most with my reading of the text and present a seemingly “quirky” argument.

Simple Bibliography

Shauna Singh Baldwin. “A Disturbing Tale About the Limits of Language: Toronto Edition.” National Post (Toronto), 2005.

Chaudhuri, Supriya. “Translating Loss: Place and Language in Amitav Ghosh and Salman Rushdie.” Etudes Anglaises, vol. 62, no. 3, 2009, pp. 266–79, https://doi.org/10.3917/etan.623.0266.

Nayar, Pramod K. “The Postcolonial Uncanny; The Politics of Dispossession in Amitav Ghosh’s ‘The Hungry Tide.’” College Literature, vol. 37, no. 4, 2010, pp. 88–119. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27917766. Accessed 23 Nov. 2022.

Chaudhuri, Supriya. « Translating loss: place and language in Amitav Ghosh and Salman Rushdie », Études anglaises, vol. 62, no. 3, 2009, pp. 266-279.

Cheyne, Ria. “Created Languages in Science Fiction.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 35, no. 3, 2008, pp. 386–403. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25475175. Accessed 23 Nov. 2022.

 

 As I continue my search in creating my paper on “language communication” and its uses both verbally and non verbally, with the novel “The hungry tide” by Amitav Ghosh I came across some interesting articles. I went online to hunter database and searched on Jstor for the name of the novel specifically, as well as general “language” and “linguistics” searches and found a few results that I shall read more on. Also with the suggestion of Professor Allred I will read back on Nayars piece as well. 

Simple Bibliography

Pradittatsanee, Darin. “Conditionality, Non-Self, and Non-Attachment in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide: A Buddhist Reading.” Manusya : Journal of Humanities, vol. 2018, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-02102001.

 

Found this using Hunter Library Database by searching the book title. 

 

Kalaiarasan, M., and R. Sowmiyalatha. “Trans-Cultural Communication in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide.” Language in India, vol. 19, no. 7, 2019, p. 323–.

 

Found using Hunter Library Database by searching book title and identity

 

https://www.the-criterion.com/V3/n3/Raja.pdf

 

Found on Google Scholars by searching the book title

 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sanjay-Zagade/publication/344787388_Issues_of_Identity_in_Amitav_Ghosh’s_The_Hungry_Tide/links/5f906019a6fdccfd7b724a39/Issues-of-Identity-in-Amitav-Ghoshs-The-Hungry-Tide.pdf

 

Found in Google Scholars by searching the book title

 

http://www.rjelal.com/5.3.17/199-206%20P.PRADEEP.pdf

 

10:04 Blog

As the chapters of 10:04:a novel came to an end I had a sense that the narrator was trying to portray the end of a sinking city. After the storm he made a few notable references to water and ocean animals. My correlation to these hints may be completely bizarre but it felt as though he was referring to the city in the future being totally unsustainable and literally sunken under water. An example of this would be when he says “although the chances of the creature never making landfall remain significant.” He refers to his unborn “future” child as a creature never making it out the womb (water) also he states “There was a small mammal developing within her-“ (326) He does reference specifically octopuses many times and in particular says “or maybe something more sci-if:an author changes into an octopus.”(219)

 The connection he tries to relay to futuristic sci-fi and his interpretation of what generations will look like is also quite evident. Lerner ends the story first with a chapter from Robertos book “To The Future ” where scientist were wrong and we as a population were seemingly sheep for years in believing something that was false only because it was said to be true. I took that as a warning maybe to not believe everything your told, he also had a part where he discussed the government regulating people and watching phones and how the weather could be manipulated (man-made storms) when he was speaking to Calvin. These seem like inconspicuous messages to the reader to ruminate on.

The very last part also dictated a message to future readers, as he describes life in one big pattern, generic and predictable as he talks about the cliche sayings of people he encounters, yet he ends with saying “I am looking back on a totaled city in the second person plural.” Although this was a very strange novel to adjust to, I did enjoy the clever way things fit together as a whole.